Home › Journal SEO Ranking › Public ranking
Public ranking · v3

Journal SEO Ranking: Top 100 Biomedical Journals

A reproducible compliance audit of how well the top 100 biomedical journal platforms are technically set up for search and AI-citation discoverability. Every score derives from direct HTML inspection of sample articles, fetched as Googlebot, against 17 checks split across three weighted categories: on-page article SEO (60%), registry presence (20%), and crawler-friendliness (20%). Read the methodology for what each check measures and how the dual-UA fetch chain works. Click any column header to sort.

Version 3.0 Captured 15 April 2026 CC-BY 4.0
100Journals scored
17Checks per journal
1Excellent
37Good
53Adequate
9Poor
How to read this ranking. The composite (0–100) is a weighted sum of three categories: On-page article SEO (60%), Highwire citation_* meta, Schema.org Article JSON-LD, OpenGraph, Twitter card, canonical URL, <title>, meta description, h1, semantic HTML + alt text, abstract-in-body. Registry presence (20%), CrossRef coverage, MEDLINE indexing, DOAJ membership (closed-access auto-pass), OpenAlex works count. Crawler-friendliness (20%), robots.txt AI-bot allowances (GPTBot/ClaudeBot/PerplexityBot/Google-Extended), llms.txt presence, sitemap discovery. The ranking is by inspection of HTML against documented requirements, not a prediction of any downstream retrieval outcome. The Research-UA reach column is the legacy "did the article respond to a polite scholarly crawler" datum, it is NOT scored, but is preserved for the crawler-blocking analysis.

Journals , Top 100 biomedical by h-index

All 100 journals scored on the same 17 checks. Sortable by clicking any column. Hover over a row to highlight; click a DOI link to inspect the actual sample article we scored.

Excellent (85+)
Good (70–84)
Adequate (50–69)
Poor (<50)
# Journal Publisher Composite Tier On-page Registry Crawler h-idx OA DOAJ k Sample Research UA %
1 The EMBO Journal Springer Nature 85.4 Excellent 87 100 67 563 Yes Yes 3 DOI 100
2 Nature Methods Nature Portfolio 80.7 Good 90 100 33 507 No , 3 DOI 100
3 The Journal of Immunology American Association of Immunologists 80.1 Good 78 100 67 528 No , 3 DOI 0
4 PLoS ONE Public Library of Science 79.1 Good 76 100 67 592 Yes Yes 3 DOI 100
5 Nature Genetics Nature Portfolio 78.9 Good 87 100 33 781 No , 3 DOI 100
6 Nature Medicine Nature Portfolio 78.9 Good 87 100 33 757 No , 3 DOI 100
7 Nature Biotechnology Nature Portfolio 78.9 Good 87 100 33 629 No , 3 DOI 100
8 Nature Neuroscience Nature Portfolio 78.9 Good 87 100 33 598 No , 3 DOI 100
9 Nature Immunology Nature Portfolio 78.9 Good 87 100 33 520 No , 3 DOI 100
10 Nature Nanotechnology Nature Portfolio 78.9 Good 87 100 33 496 No , 3 DOI 100
11 Nature Cell Biology Nature Portfolio 78.9 Good 87 100 33 484 No , 3 DOI 100
12 Bioinformatics Oxford University Press 78.3 Good 75 100 67 564 Yes Yes 3 DOI 0
13 American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine American Thoracic Society 78.3 Good 75 100 67 506 No , 3 DOI 0
14 Brain Oxford University Press 78.3 Good 75 100 67 500 No , 3 DOI 0
15 JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute Oxford University Press 78.3 Good 75 100 67 489 No , 3 DOI 0
16 The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism Oxford University Press 78.3 Good 75 100 67 488 No , 3 DOI 0
17 European Heart Journal Oxford University Press 78.3 Good 75 100 67 451 No , 3 DOI 0
18 Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology Nature Portfolio 77.7 Good 85 100 33 616 No , 1 DOI 100
19 Nature Reviews Microbiology Nature Portfolio 77.7 Good 85 100 33 481 No , 1 DOI 100
20 PEDIATRICS American Academy of Pediatrics 76.2 Good 72 100 67 514 No , 3 DOI 0
21 Nature reviews. Neuroscience Nature Portfolio 75.9 Good 82 100 33 568 No , 1 DOI 100
22 Annual Review of Biochemistry Annual Reviews 75.6 Good 70 100 67 539 No , 3 DOI 100
23 Annual Review of Immunology Annual Reviews 75.5 Good 70 100 67 436 No , 3 DOI 100
24 Nucleic Acids Research Oxford University Press 75.1 Good 78 75 67 873 Yes Yes 3 DOI 0
25 The Journal of Comparative Neurology Wiley 74.4 Good 74 100 50 431 No , 3 DOI 0
26 Nature reviews. Cancer Nature Portfolio 73.4 Good 78 100 33 593 No , 3 DOI 0
27 Nature Nature Portfolio 72.9 Good 77 100 33 1834 No , 3 DOI 100
28 Neurology Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 72.2 Good 68 100 58 522 No , 3 DOI 0
29 The Journal of Physiology Wiley 72.0 Good 70 100 50 483 No , 3 DOI 0
30 Angewandte Chemie International Edition Wiley 71.9 Good 70 100 50 723 No , 3 DOI 0
31 Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences National Academy of Sciences 71.6 Good 66 100 58 1163 No , 3 DOI 0
32 Diabetes American Diabetes Association 71.3 Good 63 100 67 445 No , 3 DOI 0
33 Diabetes Care American Diabetes Association 71.0 Good 63 100 67 506 No , 3 DOI 0
34 Cancer Research American Association for Cancer Research 70.8 Good 62 100 67 466 No , 3 DOI 0
35 Cancer Wiley 70.6 Good 68 100 50 471 No , 3 DOI 0
36 Nature Reviews Genetics Nature Portfolio 70.5 Good 73 100 33 525 No , 1 DOI 100
37 Nature Reviews Drug Discovery Nature Portfolio 70.5 Good 73 100 33 470 No , 1 DOI 100
38 ACS Nano American Chemical Society 70.1 Good 64 100 58 554 No , 3 DOI 0
39 JAMA American Medical Association 69.5 Adequate 77 75 42 994 No , 3 DOI 0
40 Biochemistry American Chemical Society 69.3 Adequate 63 100 58 441 No , 3 DOI 0
41 Applied and Environmental Microbiology American Society for Microbiology 68.3 Adequate 61 100 58 476 Yes Yes 3 DOI 33
42 Molecular and Cellular Biology Taylor & Francis 68.3 Adequate 61 100 58 458 No , 3 DOI 0
43 Scientific Reports Nature Portfolio 67.8 Adequate 68 100 33 453 Yes Yes 3 DOI 100
44 American Journal of Psychiatry American Psychiatric Association 67.5 Adequate 60 100 58 550 No , 3 DOI 0
45 The Journal of Physical Chemistry B American Chemical Society 67.5 Adequate 60 100 58 445 No , 3 DOI 0
46 Chemical Society Reviews Royal Society of Chemistry 67.0 Adequate 56 100 67 747 No , 3 DOI 100
47 Nature Communications Nature Portfolio 67.0 Adequate 67 100 33 729 Yes Yes 3 DOI 100
48 Science American Association for the Advancement of Science 66.0 Adequate 60 100 50 1740 No , 3 DOI 0
49 NeuroImage Elsevier BV 65.0 Adequate 53 100 67 528 Yes Yes 3 DOI 100
50 The Plant Cell Oxford University Press 65.0 Adequate 75 100 0 500 No , 3 DOI 0
51 Clinical Infectious Diseases Oxford University Press 65.0 Adequate 75 100 0 481 No , 3 DOI 0
52 PLANT PHYSIOLOGY Oxford University Press 65.0 Adequate 75 100 0 472 No , 3 DOI 0
53 Archives of General Psychiatry American Medical Association 64.5 Adequate 82 75 0 544 No , 3 DOI 0
54 Journal of Neuroscience Society for Neuroscience 64.4 Adequate 52 100 67 651 No , 3 DOI 100
55 New England Journal of Medicine Massachusetts Medical Society 64.1 Adequate 68 75 42 1497 No , 3 DOI 0
56 Physics Today AIP Publishing 62.8 Adequate 57 75 67 461 No , 3 DOI 100
57 Annals of Internal Medicine American College of Physicians 62.2 Adequate 59 75 58 649 No , 3 DOI 0
58 Journal of Molecular Biology Elsevier BV 61.4 Adequate 47 100 67 485 No , 3 DOI 100
59 Annals of Neurology Wiley 60.5 Adequate 68 100 0 435 No , 3 DOI 0
60 Nature reviews. Immunology Nature Portfolio 60.2 Adequate 56 100 33 562 No , 3 ,
61 Trends in Cognitive Sciences Elsevier BV 60.2 Adequate 67 100 0 455 No , 3 DOI 100
62 The Journal of Experimental Medicine Rockefeller University Press 59.2 Adequate 65 100 0 648 No , 3 DOI 0
63 The Journal of Cell Biology Rockefeller University Press 59.2 Adequate 65 100 0 597 No , 3 DOI 0
64 Cancer Cell Cell Press 58.9 Adequate 65 100 0 480 No , 3 DOI 100
65 Cell Cell Press 58.7 Adequate 64 100 0 1220 No , 3 DOI 100
66 The Lancet Oncology Elsevier BV 58.4 Adequate 64 100 0 512 No , 3 DOI 100
67 Archives of Internal Medicine American Medical Association 58.4 Adequate 72 75 0 458 No , 2 DOI 0
68 The Lancet Neurology Elsevier BV 58.4 Adequate 64 100 0 452 No , 3 DOI 100
69 Neuron Cell Press 58.0 Adequate 63 100 0 695 No , 2 DOI 100
70 Immunity Cell Press 57.6 Adequate 63 100 0 563 No , 3 DOI 100
71 Current Biology Elsevier BV 57.6 Adequate 63 100 0 452 No , 3 DOI 100
72 Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres American Geophysical Union 57.3 Adequate 70 75 0 652 No , 3 DOI 0
73 Journal of Biological Chemistry Elsevier BV 57.2 Adequate 62 100 0 778 Yes Yes 2 DOI 100
74 Circulation Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 55.8 Adequate 60 100 0 841 No , 3 DOI 0
75 Psychological Review American Psychological Association 55.8 Adequate 38 100 67 515 No , 3 DOI 0
76 Journal of the American College of Cardiology Elsevier BV 55.7 Adequate 60 100 0 612 No , 3 DOI 100
77 Annals of Surgery Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 55.3 Adequate 59 100 0 453 No , 3 DOI 0
78 Trends in Ecology & Evolution Elsevier BV 55.2 Adequate 67 75 0 511 No , 3 DOI 100
79 Trends in Neurosciences Elsevier BV 55.2 Adequate 67 75 0 439 No , 3 DOI 100
80 Physiological Reviews American Physiological Society 54.9 Adequate 58 100 0 558 No , 3 DOI 0
81 Journal of Neurophysiology American Physiological Society 54.9 Adequate 58 100 0 432 No , 3 DOI 0
82 Blood Elsevier BV 54.5 Adequate 57 100 0 636 No , 3 DOI 0
83 Journal of Clinical Oncology Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 53.6 Adequate 56 100 0 735 No , 3 DOI 0
84 Circulation Research Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 53.6 Adequate 56 100 0 501 No , 3 DOI 0
85 Stroke Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 52.8 Adequate 55 100 0 455 No , 3 DOI 0
86 Development The Company of Biologists 52.0 Adequate 62 75 0 469 No , 3 DOI 0
87 Biomaterials Elsevier BV 51.7 Adequate 53 100 0 488 No , 3 DOI 100
88 Gut BMJ 51.7 Adequate 42 100 33 448 No , 3 DOI 0
89 Gastroenterology Elsevier BV 51.6 Adequate 53 100 0 583 No , 2 DOI 100
90 Hepatology Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 51.3 Adequate 52 100 0 479 No , 3 DOI 0
91 American Journal of Clinical Nutrition Elsevier BV 51.0 Adequate 52 100 0 495 No , 3 DOI 100
92 Journal of Clinical Investigation American Society for Clinical Investigation 49.8 Poor 38 100 33 708 Yes Yes 3 DOI 67
93 Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery Wolters Kluwer 49.2 Poor 49 100 0 466 No , 3 DOI 0
94 Bioresource Technology Elsevier BV 48.7 Poor 48 100 0 431 No , 3 DOI 100
95 Radiology Radiological Society of North America 48.6 Poor 56 75 0 430 No , 3 DOI 0
96 Genes & Development Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press 48.1 Poor 55 75 0 594 Yes No 3 DOI 0
97 Molecular Cell Elsevier BV 47.5 Poor 46 100 0 529 No , 3 DOI 100
98 Cell Metabolism Cell Press 47.5 Poor 46 100 0 444 No , 3 DOI 100
99 Physics Reports Elsevier BV 46.9 Poor 53 75 0 455 No , 2 DOI 100
100 Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews Elsevier BV 43.9 Poor 56 50 0 457 No , 3 DOI 0
Download & reproduce

Open data, open methodology, open critique

Every score is derived from direct HTML inspection of sample articles fetched as Googlebot. Disputes are resolved by re-running the specific check that contradicts the entry. The build script is in this repository; re-running it against the same DOI list produces the same scores (modulo publisher HTML edits).

Methodology Read the framework 17 checks, 3 weighted categories, dual-UA fetch chain documented XLSX Workbook 3 sheets: Ranking, Per-check detail, Methodology JSON Raw data Full per-check audit trail for the 100 journals, including every sample article inspected Blog Crawler-blocking analysis Why only a handful of these journals are simultaneously reachable AND declared open to AI bots Blog Beyond impact factor Why venue-level IF is a weak predictor of an individual paper’s real-world reach Blog bioRxiv SEO If your journal platform scores poorly here, a well-optimised preprint is often the most reliable reachable URL